2013年香港公眾假期特別多，potential黃金週遍佈整年。
其實在這些黃金週輕鬆照常上班，放棄連環長假也值得的。
工作天最累人的不是工作本身，而是在peak hour上班下班迫地鐵等小巴的時候 ：人多擠迫，小巴排第17的無奈，上上落落碰碰撞撞搖搖的窒息感覺，還有突然高速短跑追小巴趕上班的反胃情節等等；今天卻可以悠閒慢步，小巴只有零丁數人排隊，由九龍塘到旺角更可坐下來聽聽歌。
辦公室內也slow down 了一點，老闆們都去放假了，client也放假了，電話整天只響了四五次，終於可以耐心清一下擱置已久的tasks，輕快地準時下班，買個yogurt，買個六合彩，done with the day!
– TVB飲食節目氾濫啦！weekends一開電視就係食物，weekdays一定係警匪-related電視劇。悶到呢。我都慢慢migrate去Pearl啦。
– Better keep a pencil and notepad right next to my bed. Sleep = ideas start to blossom, out of control.
– 人情 is like a bank account. Need consistent disposal as a buffer to unavoidable withdrawal.
– Feedback-phobia. >.<
– Constantly jumping around different areas of thoughts to keep myself calm. Is this effective? Or shall I conquer the dark concerns one by one? Or shall I simply label them as ‘none of my business’?
candy crush should seriously consider making their own branded candies :P
Convey’s time management matrix – determined by urgency (a burning ‘yes!’, react NOW) and importance (contributes to my goals).
Quadrant 1: urgent + important
What: Require immediate attention but will stress you out.
Example: Deadline-driven projects, problems or crisises.
To me: Revision for JLPT.
Quadrant 2: not urgent + important
What: A long-term development around your principle center and mission.
Example: Relationship building, search for new opportunities and interests in life, leisure, keep a balance in life.
To me: Re-evaluate my life goals, blog, go to gym, keep a healthy diet, read books and news, catch up with friends regularly, spend time with family…e.t.c.
Quadrant 3: urgent + unimportant
What: Usually short-term emotional status or distractions we have to deal with, keep them short.
Example: Feeling victimized, frustrated, discouraged or just simply a phone call.
To me: My emotional swings and random thoughts/impulses.
Quadrant 4: not urgent + unimportant
What: Where we tend to escape to or kill time.
Example: Worthless time wasters or pleasant activities.
To me: FB, candy crush…>.<
Explore your time matrix too!
My long weekend summary? Here you go:
我們集團的taboo，是“try”。不能說，不能寫，也不能做。不可以try my best，一定要do my best，要絕對肯定自己在做的事情，合情，合理，有效。這與我們實是求是的精神相符。
「讓愛與和平佔領中環」只求犧牲，不求癱瘓。精神可嘉卻有幾個矛盾點。
一‘ 字面上平和的「愛與和平」和帶攻擊性的「佔領」完全矛盾，偉大地高呼「 大家為世界大同打劫」，在信念書上更白紙黑字寫著：「雖是不合法，但必須絕對非暴力」。Well，最基本請先用成熟合理的前文後理來說服我。
二’ 在電視新聞上，發起人揚言佔領中環不求癱瘓中環，就算造成緊急狀態，一一都是政府故意弄成的。What? 革命還沒有發生就先來卸責告狀，把罪名先推向政府身上，幼稚言論令人屑笑。而且我也想看看佔領中環要道如何能不癱瘓中環，高超戲法，拭目而待。
三‘ 三人多次強調自我犧牲，準備失去自由來換取普選，不會抵抗，歡迎拒捕。殺身成仁，捨身取義，簽好生死狀。好！面對法紀竟能如此無所畏懼，值得我們學習鼓掌。
我沒有什麼高見，很多香港人也的確被佔領中環感召。我絕對支持背後的objectives，definitely I think 愛國愛港不與中央抵抗的框架 is extremely ridiculous. 但認為活動的包裝可以再修飾一點，it sounds like a potential riot with a contradicting opening。出身法律界的發起人，手法可否再高明點，文明點。這肯定不是唯一的抗命方法。
探子
執
愛回家
