雙重標準

資料A: “Thugs”, “the looting starts, the shooting starts.”

資料B: “Fired Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was charged with third-degree murder and manslaughter in the death of George Floyd

最近美國白人警察謀殺George Floyd案,就睇到極端方(either side) 都一樣雙重標準,只會死抓住利於自己嘅事實「如獲至寶」,而選擇收埋/無視/輕輕帶過不利自己的事實。 啱咪比個✅,錯咪比個❌囉,可唔可以對事不對人? 一個人/機構/國家唔可以同時有✅同❌架咩?

「是否利多於弊,你是否同意?」其實每一件事都有有兩邊,但當一個人已經堅持覺得係「冇討論餘地」,咁就冇嘢可以討論了。

One thought on “雙重標準”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s